65s vs a nit's range: Equity & Strategy

Six-Five Suited (65s) has 31.6% equity all-in preflop against a nit's range — 104 combos, 7.8% of all starting hands. It wins 31.3% of runouts outright, loses 68.1% and chops 0.6%. These are exact figures from full board enumeration against every unblocked combo in the range, not a simulation.

SideWinChopEquity
65s31.3%0.6%31.6%
a nit's range68.1%0.6%68.4%

The range this is computed against

The rock at the table: 77+, ATs+, KQs and AJo+, a shade under 8% of hands. A nit almost never has a marginal holding — when they put money in voluntarily, the range is close to this and their bluff frequency is close to zero.

nit — 104 combos, 7.8% of all starting hands: AA, KK, QQ, JJ, TT, 99, 88, 77, AKs, AQs, AJs, ATs, KQs, AKo, AQo, AJo

After card removal, 104 of those 104 combos are still available (0 are blocked by the cards 65s holds). 65s is ahead of 0 and behind 104.

Hardest parts of the range for 65s

HandCombos65s equity
77618.7%
88619.9%
99621.1%
TT621.8%
JJ622.1%

Easiest parts of the range for 65s

HandCombos65s equity
AKo1241.5%
AQo1241.4%
AJo1241.0%
AKs438.9%
AQs438.8%

Put 65s up against a nit's range — 104 combos, 7.8% of all hands — and the exact answer is 31.6% equity: 31.3% outright wins, 68.1% losses and 0.6% chops. None of the range's combos share a card with 65s, so all 104 of them are live in this calculation. There is not one combo in the range that 65s is a favourite against: all 104 live combos are in front of it. A range-average of 31.6% here is not an average of good spots and bad ones — every spot is a bad one.

Where does the range come from? The rock at the table: 77+, ATs+, KQs and AJo+, a shade under 8% of hands. A nit almost never has a marginal holding — when they put money in voluntarily, the range is close to this and their bluff frequency is close to zero. Broken down hand by hand, 65s does worst against 77 (18.7%), 88 (19.9%) and 99 (21.1%) and best against AKo (41.5%), AQo (41.4%) and AJo (41.0%). Across the whole range 65s's equity swings from 18.7% at the bottom to 41.5% at the top — the single 31.6% headline is the combo-weighted average of all of it.

Against a nit, the range is the whole story: 7.8% of hands, no bluffs, and 65s at 31.6%. 31.6% against a range with no bluffs in it means folding is not weak, it is correct. The classic leak is paying off a rock with a hand that is "too good to fold".

65s vs nit FAQ

What is 65s's equity against a nit's range?

65s has 31.6% equity all-in preflop against a nit's range — it wins 31.3% of runouts outright, loses 68.1% and chops 0.6%. The range holds 104 combos (7.8% of all hands); all 104 are live. This is exact full board enumeration, not a simulation.

Which hands in a nit's range beat 65s?

All of them — 65s is behind every one of the 104 live combos. The worst are 77 (18.7%), 88 (19.9%) and 99 (21.1%), and the closest it gets is AKo (41.5%), AQo (41.4%) and AJo (41.0%). Every figure is exact, computed against that hand's unblocked combos only.

What hands are in a nit's range?

16 hand classes and 104 combos — 7.8% of the 1,326 possible starting hands. By combo count it is 46% pocket pairs (8 pairs, 48 combos), 19% suited hands (5 classes, 20 combos) and 35% offsuit hands (3 classes, 36 combos). That shape is why 65s runs at 31.6% against it rather than against a random hand.

Does 65s do better against a wider or a tighter range?

Wider, almost always. 65s has 39.4% equity against a loose-passive calling range (50.5% of hands) but 32.5% against a 4-betting range (3.2%). Equity against a range is mostly a question of how many weak hands the range still contains — which is why the same holding can be a monster against a button open and a fold against a 4-bet.

Run any hand vs range in the free equity calculator · All hand-vs-range matchups · 65s vs utg-open · 65s vs co-open · 65s vs btn-open · aa vs nit · kk vs nit · qq vs nit