TT vs a 3-bet bluffing range: Equity & Strategy

Pocket Tens (TT) has 68.0% equity all-in preflop against a 3-bet bluffing range — 52 combos, 3.9% of all starting hands. It wins 67.7% of runouts outright, loses 31.6% and chops 0.7%. These are exact figures from full board enumeration against every unblocked combo in the range, not a simulation.

The range this is computed against

The bluff half of a polarised 3-bet is built from hands that are too weak to flat profitably but that block the opener's best continues or flop well when called: the suited wheel aces (which block AA and AK), suited broadways like KJs and QTs, and the suited connectors. About 4% of hands.

3-bet (bluff) — 52 combos, 3.9% of all starting hands: A5s, A4s, A3s, A2s, KJs, KTs, QJs, QTs, JTs, T9s, 87s, 76s, 65s

After card removal, 44 of those 52 combos are still available (8 are blocked by the cards TT holds). TT is ahead of 44 and behind 0.

Hardest parts of the range for TT

Easiest parts of the range for TT

TT has 68.0% equity all-in preflop against a 3-bet bluffing range — 52 combos, 3.9% of all hands. Pocket Tens wins the pot outright 67.7% of the time, loses 31.6% and chops 0.7%. Your own two cards remove 8 of those combos before the flop is even dealt — a blocker effect this number already accounts for, because every combo containing one of your exact cards is stripped out of the range first. TT is a favourite against every one of the 44 live combos in the range — there is nothing in it you would rather not see.

The bluff half of a polarised 3-bet is built from hands that are too weak to flat profitably but that block the opener's best continues or flop well when called: the suited wheel aces (which block AA and AK), suited broadways like KJs and QTs, and the suited connectors. About 4% of hands. Inside that range, the combos that hurt TT most are QJs (53.0%), KJs (53.8%) and JTs (61.3%); the ones you want to see are T9s (82.3%), 87s (80.3%) and 76s (79.0%). Across the whole range TT's equity swings from 53.0% at the bottom to 82.3% at the top — the single 68.0% headline is the combo-weighted average of all of it.

Against a 3-bet bluffing range — only 3.9% of hands — TT holds 68.0%. That is enough to play a big pot: get it in, or 4-bet and let the bluffs fold out.

TT vs 3-bet (bluff) FAQ

What is TT's equity against a 3-bet bluffing range?

TT has 68.0% equity all-in preflop against a 3-bet bluffing range — it wins 67.7% of runouts outright, loses 31.6% and chops 0.7%. The range holds 52 combos (3.9% of all hands); TT blocks 8 of them, leaving 44 live. This is exact full board enumeration, not a simulation.

Which hands in a 3-bet bluffing range beat TT?

None — TT is a favourite against all 44 live combos. Its thinnest edges are QJs (53.0%), KJs (53.8%) and JTs (61.3%), its biggest against T9s (82.3%), 87s (80.3%) and 76s (79.0%). Every figure is exact, computed against that hand's unblocked combos only.

What hands are in a 3-bet bluffing range?

13 hand classes and 52 combos — 3.9% of the 1,326 possible starting hands. By combo count it is 0% pocket pairs (0 pairs, 0 combos), 100% suited hands (13 classes, 52 combos) and 0% offsuit hands (0 classes, 0 combos) — it contains no offsuit hands at all. That shape is why TT runs at 68.0% against it rather than against a random hand.

Does TT do better against a wider or a tighter range?

Wider, almost always. TT has 68.6% equity against a loose-passive calling range (50.5% of hands) but 42.2% against a 4-betting range (3.2%). Equity against a range is mostly a question of how many weak hands the range still contains — which is why the same holding can be a monster against a button open and a fold against a 4-bet.

Run any hand vs range in the free equity calculator · All hand-vs-range matchups · tt vs utg-open · tt vs mp-open · tt vs co-open · aa vs 3bet-value · aa vs 3bet-bluff · kk vs 3bet-value