KQ vs K9s: Odds & Interactive Calculator
| Hand | Win | Tie | Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| KQ (King-Queen) | 67.1% | 5.4% | 69.8% |
| K9s (King-Nine Suited) | 27.5% | 5.4% | 30.2% |
Suited vs offsuit: KQ
| Matchup | Win | Tie | Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| KQs | 68.1% | 5.2% | 70.7% |
| KQo | 66.8% | 5.4% | 69.5% |
How KQ vs K9s unfolds by street
King-Queen (KQ) is still ahead on 83% of flops against K9s, and the lead survives to the turn on 78%. K9s takes the lead on the other 17% of flops. These figures come from full board enumeration, not a simulation.
| Street | KQ still ahead | K9s flipped the lead |
|---|---|---|
| Flop | 83% | 17% |
| Turn | 78% | 22% |
Share a card and you get a kicker problem — that's KQ vs K9s: KQ wins 67.1%, K9s wins 27.5%, and 5.4% of boards chop. Note the chunky 5.4% chop rate — it surfaces whenever the shared rank plays and the kickers don't. Spots like this are where stacks quietly disappear: the dominated hand can't fold pre and can't outrun the kicker post.
Translate that into a decision and it's simple pot-odds math: counting split pots as half, KQ carries 69.8% equity and K9s 30.2%. Against a pot-sized shove you need about 33% to call and about 25% versus a half-pot bet — so K9s needs real fold equity, not just its raw share, to justify stacking off.
Domination is where preflop hand-reading pays off. With KQ you want stacks in; with K9s you want out, because three outs and a prayer is not a stack-off — recognizing that you're crushed against a strong range is worth more than any postflop move.
KQ vs K9s FAQ
Who wins KQ vs K9s preflop?
KQ (King-Queen) is the favorite, winning 67.1% of all runouts, while K9s (King-Nine Suited) wins 27.5%. The remaining 5.4% are split pots. Counting splits as half, KQ's preflop equity is 69.8%.
Does the KQ vs K9s probability change all-in preflop?
No. Once both hands are all-in preflop the odds are set by the cards alone — position, stack size and who bet first change nothing. The only thing that moves the number is suits: KQ's equity runs from 69.1% to 70.7% depending on suitedness and which suits the two hands share, which is why different sites quote slightly different figures. It does change once board cards are dealt (KQ leads on 83% of flops) and in multiway pots, where every extra caller takes equity from both hands.
Why is K9s so bad against KQ?
Because they share a card, K9s is drawing to roughly three outs and chops 5.4% of the time — it wins only about 1 in 4. That's the danger of a dominated hand: too strong to fold, too far behind to outdraw, which is how kicker problems quietly cost full stacks.
Does KQ hold up against K9s after the flop?
KQ is still ahead on 83% of flops and stays ahead through the turn on 78% of boards; K9s takes the lead on the other 17% of flops. These are exact figures from full board enumeration.
Run any matchup in the free equity calculator · AK VS A2S · AK VS A3S · AK VS A4S · AK VS A5S · AK VS A6S · AK VS A7S
KQ against a range
All-in against one known hand is the textbook case; at the table KQ is usually up against a range. Exact equities, computed over every combo with card removal applied:
- KQ vs calling station — 55.8% against 670 combos (50.5% of hands)
- KQ vs BTN open — 53.8% against 586 combos (44.2% of hands)
- KQ vs CO open — 50.8% against 366 combos (27.6% of hands)
- KQ vs 10bb shove — 46.8% against 334 combos (25.2% of hands)